commonsense
发表于 2025-3-23 12:19:07
Gerd Meier zu Köcker,Thomas Wolfes it, comprises material objects (or, alternatively, space-time points), sets of material objects, sets of sets of material objects,... but no ., .,or .. Let us thus examine the question: Can the principle of individuation for properties ever be made clear?
Simulate
发表于 2025-3-23 14:37:23
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3153/315263/315263_12.png
larder
发表于 2025-3-23 21:17:03
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3153/315263/315263_13.png
Communal
发表于 2025-3-24 01:56:38
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230596061ciate and mentor. I hope that a chronology of our collaboration — with emphasis on . will be of general interest, perhaps by shedding some new light on the professional development of this remarkable man.
使增至最大
发表于 2025-3-24 02:28:33
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3153/315263/315263_15.png
独轮车
发表于 2025-3-24 09:22:10
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3153/315263/315263_16.png
删减
发表于 2025-3-24 12:32:26
Reminiscences of Peter,e great satisfaction to write such a note about Peter who has, for many years, been not only my admired and close friend, but also my philosophic associate and mentor. I hope that a chronology of our collaboration — with emphasis on . will be of general interest, perhaps by shedding some new light o
洞穴
发表于 2025-3-24 17:58:07
Natural Kinds, on the other by Goodman’s puzzle of the grue emeralds.. I shall begin my remarks by relating the one puzzle to the other, and the other to an innate flair that we have for natural kinds. Then I shall devote the rest of the paper to reflections on the nature of this notion of natural kinds and its r
ANTE
发表于 2025-3-24 21:02:07
Inductive Independence and the Paradoxes of Confirmation,oblem is, the more further discussion it is likely to prompt. One of the best examples of problems that have provoked an extensive literature is the paradox of confirmation (‘raven paradox’) to which Hempel called the attention of the philosophical community in his ‘Studies in the Logic of Confirmat
档案
发表于 2025-3-25 02:59:59
Partial Entailment as a Basis for Inductive Logic,bability. His intriguing ‘paradoxes of confirmation’ have brought forth an avalanche of responses, and more keep coming.. Some of the conditions of adequacy he enunciated, especially the ‘equivalence condition’, are central to current controversies.. Moreover, he has, in the meantime, continued to m