收藏品
发表于 2025-3-23 10:13:32
Zermelo s1921,ithin mathematics. Zermelo’s ., comprising five multi-part philosophical “theses”, should be understood in that spirit. Despite its brevity, . is somewhat repetitive. It seems that Zermelo had no intention of publishing it even as part of some longer piece. Instead, . likely functioned as a personal
molest
发表于 2025-3-23 17:38:34
Zermelo 1927,s thesis, Zermelo criticizes “the truly discouraging effect of the French original memoirs” on the promulgation of the theory of measure and expresses the opinion that “a simple and clearly arranged development of the theory from the fundamentals satisfying at the same time all requirements of scien
VALID
发表于 2025-3-23 18:11:49
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3149/314851/314851_13.png
财产
发表于 2025-3-24 01:00:23
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3149/314851/314851_14.png
Pituitary-Gland
发表于 2025-3-24 05:10:23
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3149/314851/314851_15.png
单色
发表于 2025-3-24 08:40:50
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3149/314851/314851_16.png
CLEAR
发表于 2025-3-24 10:42:32
Zermelo 1904,’s correspondence or Zermelo’s papers, and its fate is not known. There do exist in Zermelo’s hand some fragments from a draft of this letter, but the bulk of the proof is missing. Thus, all that we really have is the published paper.
Stress
发表于 2025-3-24 16:45:08
Zermelo 1927,n to his thesis, Alexandrow likewise points out that “the line of thought of the entire development and the essential results [...] have been communicated to [...] [] by Herrn Prof. Zermelo for a systematic elaboration”. — It is only in 1927 after a long break that Zermelo himself submit
lambaste
发表于 2025-3-24 20:04:16
Book 2010each other on opposite pages. Each paper or coherent group of papers is preceded by an introductory note provided by an acknowledged expert in the field which comments on the historical background, motivations, accomplishments, and influence..
Cupidity
发表于 2025-3-25 01:34:30
Yasmin Rustamova,Massimo Lombardi’s correspondence or Zermelo’s papers, and its fate is not known. There do exist in Zermelo’s hand some fragments from a draft of this letter, but the bulk of the proof is missing. Thus, all that we really have is the published paper.