faddish
发表于 2025-3-23 11:26:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3149/314841/314841_11.png
种族被根除
发表于 2025-3-23 15:00:07
Philosophical Documents examine physical processes very carefully, we indeed find molecular movement, but no thoughts. Electrical currents in the brain are definitely different than the green color which perhaps represents them when the subject is examined. They are . representations when we examine the brain, and not those of the examined brain.
多骨
发表于 2025-3-23 18:35:36
Mach’s Relativity vs. Einstein’s Relativitye. According to Ernst Mach (., Leipzig, 1. Auflage 1883, 7. 1912), absolute space is a “desperate” [.] thought: “If we therefore say that a body maintains its direction and velocity in space, that is merely an abbreviated way of saying with respect to the whole world.”
Fraudulent
发表于 2025-3-23 22:28:42
Three Batches of Reasons for Mach’s Rejection of Einstein’s Theory of Relativityld genius. (Einstein’s special theory of relativity seems to have been ordinarily called “the principle of relativity”. Einstein himself apparently began to call it “the theory of relativity” from around 1909.) The book included a brief reference if not to Einstein at least to Minkowski in a supplementary note:
Mhc-Molecule
发表于 2025-3-24 05:18:55
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3149/314841/314841_15.png
conservative
发表于 2025-3-24 09:05:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3149/314841/314841_16.png
Ligneous
发表于 2025-3-24 13:09:49
Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Sciencehttp://image.papertrans.cn/e/image/314841.jpg
提名的名单
发表于 2025-3-24 16:14:53
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3149/314841/314841_18.png
雀斑
发表于 2025-3-24 20:12:38
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3149/314841/314841_19.png
ferment
发表于 2025-3-24 23:56:59
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3149/314841/314841_20.png