osculate
发表于 2025-3-25 05:44:18
L. A. Marjina,M. I. Nechushkin,V. V. Serovaconcerning the relationship of language, mind and world belongs to the most important questions of theoretical philosophy. In our paper, we take a closer look at Sosa’s modified Fregean proposal in order to find out if it provides a satisfactory answer to the modified Wittgensteinian question. We pr
COKE
发表于 2025-3-25 08:22:55
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3148/314793/314793_22.png
样式
发表于 2025-3-25 14:44:25
Amrei Bahr,Markus SeidelPresents the work of one of the most distinguished contemporary philosophers.Contains Sosa‘s original Münster Lecture on his most recent work.Presents critical papers and original responses from Sosa.
注入
发表于 2025-3-25 16:29:13
Münster Lectures in Philosophyhttp://image.papertrans.cn/e/image/314793.jpg
受伤
发表于 2025-3-25 21:27:44
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3148/314793/314793_25.png
笨重
发表于 2025-3-26 01:48:52
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3148/314793/314793_26.png
发炎
发表于 2025-3-26 04:25:20
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3148/314793/314793_27.png
戏服
发表于 2025-3-26 10:50:22
Book 2016 of inquiry include his view on empirical challenges to human rationality, his defense of the scientific status of philosophy, his concept of causality as considered against the background of the current debate, his suggestion of a middle-way between existential relativism and absolutism and his ex
倔强一点
发表于 2025-3-26 13:05:28
Stars: Attributes, Energetics, End Stages,h (subjective) confidence in our competences to accompany their (objective) reliability. As a solution for these three problems we suggest to acknowledge that the manifestation of reflective competences (especially for coherence checking) is a constitutive part of the second-order competence manifes
羊栏
发表于 2025-3-26 19:40:13
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04688-0espite being implicitly indexical, rationality nevertheless rests on some absolute dimension(s), Sosa must inform us on how it is possible for us to determine the truth value of claims that attribute rationality to agents. (3) Lastly, we invoke the distinction between irrationality and arationality