果核
发表于 2025-3-30 11:29:22
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3147/314619/314619_51.png
遭遇
发表于 2025-3-30 13:24:33
Explorations of Educational Purposes a solution of the problem of matter. His views on wave mechanics have given a profound new turn to the problem of the atom. Accordingly, it seems justified to investigate once and for all the epistemológica! aspects of the problem of the atom.
损坏
发表于 2025-3-30 17:13:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3147/314619/314619_53.png
Esophagitis
发表于 2025-3-30 22:58:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3147/314619/314619_54.png
CAJ
发表于 2025-3-31 01:47:12
The Space Problem in the New Quantum Mechanics,s a solution of the problem of matter. His views on wave mechanics have given a profound new turn to the problem of the atom. Accordingly, it seems justified to investigate once and for all the epistemológica! aspects of the problem of the atom.
Adrenal-Glands
发表于 2025-3-31 08:22:14
,Hans Reichenbach’s Vindication of Induction,and the problems confronting it. I shall then consider other attempts at vindication that in one way or another pursue a similar goal. In the end, I shall maintain, Reichenbach’s program can succeed, given certain additional considerations, a crucial one of which is found in his own writings.
allergy
发表于 2025-3-31 09:22:02
Carnap und der Physikalismus,ken und Intentionen ankommt. Danach will ich kurz auf die weitere Entwicklung hinweisen und den gegenwärtigen Stand der Diskussion charakterisieren. Der Akzent dieser Arbeit liegt nicht auf exegetischen, sondern auf systematischen Fragen, wie das auch der Intention der philosophischen Arbeit Carnaps entspricht.
ETHER
发表于 2025-3-31 14:25:16
,Making Sense of Carnap’s „Aufbau“,ightforward sense. It would be less misleading to apply to them such categories as “rich” and “profound”, or “poor” and “trivial”, in a way similar (thought not identical, of course) to the application of these categories to a work of art.
皱痕
发表于 2025-3-31 20:57:31
Every Dogma Has Its Day,that the core of Quine’s objection is that he (Quine) has an alternative epistemology to advance, one which . to make no room for analyticity. Finally, the paper shows that Quine’s alternative epistemology is itself open to very serious objections. Quine is not thereby refuted, but neither can Carnap’s analyticity be dismissed as dogma.
公式
发表于 2025-4-1 00:35:24
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3147/314619/314619_60.png