闲聊 发表于 2025-3-23 11:31:34
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-34095-9expose the traits that distinguish it from competing accounts, especially from the formally similar approach of Ludwig, while the second part provides an outlook on the merits of each of the presented approaches and evaluates their respective utility for issues of the philosophy of physics, especialResection 发表于 2025-3-23 14:45:22
978-3-031-25349-2The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl少量 发表于 2025-3-23 20:38:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3146/314567/314567_13.png标准 发表于 2025-3-23 23:44:16
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3146/314567/314567_14.png晚来的提名 发表于 2025-3-24 02:36:21
Fundamental Theories of Physicshttp://image.papertrans.cn/e/image/314567.jpgGeneric-Drug 发表于 2025-3-24 08:53:53
Introduction,hin the range of views in general philosophy of science. Since the labels for the main positions ‘Syntactic View’, ‘Semantic View’ and ‘Structural View’, which will be the topics of the subsequent chapters, are used very differently, I provide an overview on the various interpretations and explain sfixed-joint 发表于 2025-3-24 12:48:38
The Received View of Theories,r, I retrace a purely syntactic and a semantic phase in the course of its development, and discuss which of its many objections are justified. Despite the untenability of this view, its discussion is an important step to understand the differences to the syntactic view of G. Ludwig and the syntactic温和女人 发表于 2025-3-24 15:45:27
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3146/314567/314567_18.png打算 发表于 2025-3-24 19:03:21
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3146/314567/314567_19.png生锈 发表于 2025-3-25 01:53:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3146/314567/314567_20.png