我没有命令
发表于 2025-3-23 13:41:09
ntal meth odological differences and in the style of analysis between the Walrasian (and Edgeworthian) tradition of general equilibrium theory and the theo retical and policy problems raised in the framework of Keynesian and post-Keynesian macroeconomics. The conference succeeded in bringing toget
lymphoma
发表于 2025-3-23 17:23:05
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3135/313492/313492_12.png
defendant
发表于 2025-3-23 21:45:39
Meghad Desai,Manfred Keil,Sushil Wadhwaniice) of the factors of production will not necessarily coincide. Unless such constraints are introduced, models cannot explain the simultaneous existence of excess supply of an item and yet a positive market price.
健忘症
发表于 2025-3-24 01:38:41
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3135/313492/313492_14.png
垫子
发表于 2025-3-24 02:24:42
Daniel Hinton,Debbie Stevens-Gilll be to develop a framework for an econometrically implementable model of producer and consumer behavior which has only tastes, technology, distribution of resources and population as exogenous variables.
取之不竭
发表于 2025-3-24 06:54:40
Does Perfect Competition in Spatial Markets Maximize Welfare?buy from the cheapest source. Firms charge mill prices . which might be different among firms. Consumers pay the transportation cost .(.) which depends on distance . from the supplying firm. Alternatively there is a time cost .(.) for the shopping trip.
政府
发表于 2025-3-24 11:59:11
Walras’ Theory of Capital Formation and the Existence of a Temporary Equilibriuml be to develop a framework for an econometrically implementable model of producer and consumer behavior which has only tastes, technology, distribution of resources and population as exogenous variables.
600
发表于 2025-3-24 15:41:04
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3135/313492/313492_18.png
Cabinet
发表于 2025-3-24 22:53:53
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3135/313492/313492_19.png
inspired
发表于 2025-3-25 02:13:07
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25217-5would pass the rationality test, for it is easy to think of situations in which people deliberately avoid making decisions, say, on a future course of action because they have no clearly felt preference (e.g. to go on a picnic next Sunday, or stay home and watch a televised football game).