利用 发表于 2025-3-25 05:41:34
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3134/313358/313358_21.pngCpr951 发表于 2025-3-25 08:47:43
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4302-3414-2hrough a close examination of Michael Ondaatje’s . and Amitav Ghosh’s .. Bower creates comparable case studies to reveal how Ondaatje and Ghosh draw on ‘epistolary defects’ to pursue a literary material through which to adequately inscribe a subaltern history and to create human histories that ask h你正派 发表于 2025-3-25 14:59:14
Services, Launchers, and Components,gful concept of futurity, dialogue or truth in contexts governed by incommensurability. Coetzee’s novel is rarely described as an epistolary narrative, but Bower argues that . takes us through the question of how to use European literary tools to write an epistolary narrative in Africa—how to forgeDealing 发表于 2025-3-25 19:35:01
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3134/313358/313358_24.pngAbnormal 发表于 2025-3-25 21:34:00
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3134/313358/313358_25.png壁画 发表于 2025-3-26 03:23:28
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3134/313358/313358_26.png孤独无助 发表于 2025-3-26 06:12:19
978-3-319-86337-5The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017Confess 发表于 2025-3-26 10:18:21
Epistolarity and World Literature, 1980-2010978-3-319-58166-8Series ISSN 2634-6095 Series E-ISSN 2634-6109lipoatrophy 发表于 2025-3-26 13:55:41
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3134/313358/313358_29.pngEvacuate 发表于 2025-3-26 19:27:19
Rachel BowerNavigates between formalist criticism and context-based criticism.Examines a carefully selected group of key texts from a broad spectrum of Anglophone literature.Takes an original approach to twentiet