小木槌
发表于 2025-3-28 15:27:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3134/313351/313351_41.png
服从
发表于 2025-3-28 21:06:22
0166-6991 , and cognitive science.Brings together essays written by wo.The main purpose of the present volume is to advance our understanding of the notions of knowledge and context, the connections between them and the ways in which they can be modeled, in particular formalized – a question of prime importan
falsehood
发表于 2025-3-28 23:14:59
F. Marchi,Sara Bonasia,Thomas Robert them, and the ways in which they can be modeled, and in particular formalized. The question is of prime importance to such diverse disciplines as philosophy, linguistics, computer science and artificial intelligence, and cognitive science.
2否定
发表于 2025-3-29 06:20:59
Garimpagem, Formal Mining and the State, modality that is appropriate for a specific reasoning situation, seems to provide a much better model of the relation of belief to intention in deliberative reasoning. I discuss this and other applications of this more flexible conception of belief and similar attitudes.
模范
发表于 2025-3-29 08:44:26
An X-Ray into the Exo-Prosthetic Superbody,e is true or false. We give a sound and complete axiomatization and prove that the logic is decidable. We also discuss extensions of the basic logic by principles of introspection and a variant in terms of knowledge instead of belief. We finally extend the logic by events in the style of dynamic epistemic logics.
Inoperable
发表于 2025-3-29 12:22:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3134/313351/313351_46.png
Irrigate
发表于 2025-3-29 15:51:03
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3134/313351/313351_47.png
爆炸
发表于 2025-3-29 22:44:39
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88265-5r Matching inside out. The upshot is that the character of evidence provides no corresponding normative constraint on the character of belief. A further consequence is that the disposition to fully believe, while dependent on a subject’s practical interests, does not depend upon the total magnitude of the stake put at risk.
单挑
发表于 2025-3-30 01:53:47
Knowledge and Disagreement,sh between two forms of relativism, and show that neither can provide a better account of disagreement than contextualism. Disagreement thus does not supply a reason to favor the relativist’s revisionist semantics over contextualism.
绝食
发表于 2025-3-30 07:58:23
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3134/313351/313351_50.png