光滑 发表于 2025-3-25 05:10:44
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3134/313342/313342_21.pngSHOCK 发表于 2025-3-25 08:00:08
Beyond the Exclusively Propositional Era this view have been proposed in other areas of investigation. We review some of these proposals, focusing on (1) Ryle’s notion of . and Hanson’s and Kuhn’s accounts of theory-laden perception in science; (2) extensions of simple propositional representations in cognitive models and artificial intelcortex 发表于 2025-3-25 13:23:58
Can Semantics Be Syntactic?ional issues such as the relationship of ‘strong AI’ to human mentality and the adequacy of the Turing Test are discussed. Through undertaking a . similar to Searle’s but which meets new specifications given by Rapaport for an AI system, the author argues that Rapaport’s objection to Searle does not离开 发表于 2025-3-25 19:32:20
Form and Content in Semantics and their bad effects on those areas of artificial intelligence concerned with machine understanding of human language. After some discussion of the use of the term ‘epistemology’ in artificial intelligence, the paper takes as a case study the various positions held by McDermott on these issues andPruritus 发表于 2025-3-25 23:38:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3134/313342/313342_25.pngantidepressant 发表于 2025-3-26 02:43:47
Melancholic Epistemologyanxiety and to the possibility of justification or warrant for such conditions. The chief aim of the present paper is to help to remedy that deficiency with respect to depression. Taxonomy of depression reveals two distinct forms: depression (1) with intentionality and (2) without intentionality. Deglisten 发表于 2025-3-26 04:24:05
Human Understandingn, interactions cannot . that which we understand. Wittgenstein had another answer (not the one attributed to him by writers who ignore his work in psychology): understanding, he said, is seeing an item . embodying a type ., thus constraining what items will be seen as “the same”. Those who cannot s不幸的人 发表于 2025-3-26 09:58:27
Framing the Frame Problem three recent attempts to display this problem: Dennett’s problem of ignoring obviously irrelevant knowledge, Haugeland’s problem of efficiently keeping track of salient side effects, and Fodor’s problem of avoiding the use of ‘kooky’ concepts. In a negative vein, it is argued that these problems be女上瘾 发表于 2025-3-26 14:52:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3134/313342/313342_29.pngcoagulation 发表于 2025-3-26 19:22:24
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3134/313342/313342_30.png