Presbycusis
发表于 2025-3-25 05:33:41
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3134/313340/313340_21.png
constitutional
发表于 2025-3-25 09:13:16
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3134/313340/313340_22.png
协定
发表于 2025-3-25 15:13:31
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3134/313340/313340_23.png
countenance
发表于 2025-3-25 17:32:14
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3134/313340/313340_24.png
Ornithologist
发表于 2025-3-25 23:20:13
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3134/313340/313340_25.png
最有利
发表于 2025-3-26 00:43:50
The Difference Between the Psychology and the Epistemology of Perception,there is something describable as “being a Phi-x” that he is perceiving. Thus, the statement “I see a tree” is false if I am not in a tree-seeing condition, and also false if there is no tree where I claim to see it. Similarly, “He hears a bell” is not true unless he is in a particular sort of hearing condition and there is a bell.
excursion
发表于 2025-3-26 06:06:59
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3134/313340/313340_27.png
无可争辩
发表于 2025-3-26 11:47:59
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3134/313340/313340_28.png
Chronic
发表于 2025-3-26 15:36:14
Knowing in the Strong Sense,justified in studying it, first to determine exactly what it is, and then to evaluate it. I do not, of course, wish to suggest that Malcolm necessarily would accept my account of the strong sense as an accurate explication of his opinions. However, in its descriptive aspects my analysis seems compatible with his written statements.
MOTIF
发表于 2025-3-26 19:40:43
Book 1968it. This volume accordingly is entitled Epistemology I, and the next volume will be entitled Epistemology II. The Editor KNOWING IN THE STRONG SENSE PETER M. BURKHOLDER Professor Norman Malcolm has defended what he calls "the strong sense" of "know." 1 It is one of the propositional senses; i.e. wha