groggy
发表于 2025-3-25 04:11:18
ure, if construed as a demand for an inventory of knowledge the first problem is not a philosophical one any more than the question ‘What is there?‘. But it is a genuine philosophical problem if construed thus: ‘What kinds of object are knowable-and which ones are not?‘ However, it is doubtful that philosophy978-90-277-1523-4978-94-009-7027-4
枯燥
发表于 2025-3-25 10:56:35
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3134/313337/313337_22.png
事先无准备
发表于 2025-3-25 14:14:24
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3134/313337/313337_23.png
morale
发表于 2025-3-25 18:17:26
Book 1983t be done because epistemology has been pronounced dead, and methodology nonexisting; and because, when acknowledged at all, they are often misplaced. 1. DESCRIPTIVE EPISTEMOLOGY The following problems are typical of classical epistemology: (i) What can we know? (ii) How do we know? (iii) What, if a
Friction
发表于 2025-3-25 21:49:02
KnowledgeIn any event knowledge, when acquired, is a collection of learned items: it is a collection of brain processes or a disposition to replay them. Yet although we cannot detach the outcome (knowledge) from the corresponding process (cognition), we may distinguish them.
不自然
发表于 2025-3-26 03:54:27
. This must be done because epistemology has been pronounced dead, and methodology nonexisting; and because, when acknowledged at all, they are often misplaced. 1. DESCRIPTIVE EPISTEMOLOGY The following problems are typical of classical epistemology: (i) What can we know? (ii) How do we know? (iii)
喧闹
发表于 2025-3-26 07:20:23
M. Sinaasappel,M. van Iterson,C. Ince this action may benefit my kin and that one hurt them—and so on and so forth. Every problem demands making some conjecture or other, and every conjecture poses the further problem of finding out whether it is adequate (true, efficient, or good).
形容词
发表于 2025-3-26 09:07:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3134/313337/313337_28.png
烦人
发表于 2025-3-26 14:59:52
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3134/313337/313337_29.png
真实的人
发表于 2025-3-26 20:19:56
Inferringism, believe that all they have to do is collect solid facts and abstain from committing what they regard as the capital sin of the intellect, namely jumping to conclusions. But, of course, those who do not jump do not overcome any hurdles, and so do not participate in any original cognitive venture.