绝种
发表于 2025-3-23 10:06:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3134/313315/313315_11.png
Obverse
发表于 2025-3-23 16:36:16
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3134/313315/313315_12.png
旧病复发
发表于 2025-3-23 21:09:29
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3134/313315/313315_13.png
CESS
发表于 2025-3-24 00:27:59
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3134/313315/313315_14.png
愤慨点吧
发表于 2025-3-24 05:12:58
N. Sbiti,M. Di Mascolo,T. Bennani,M. AmgharIn this chapter, my aim is to provide a sensible definition of epistemic relativism and to justify the use of this definition on the basis of a close reading of the texts of Barnes and Bloor. Furthermore, it will be pointed out how the debate about epistemic relativism relates to other very fundamental debates and positions in epistemology.
Costume
发表于 2025-3-24 08:57:12
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3134/313315/313315_16.png
Impugn
发表于 2025-3-24 14:28:14
Hassan Elahi,Marco Eugeni,Paolo GaudenziIf the foregoing arguments are correct, we have good reason to think that the argument from underdetermination does not lead to the conclusion that Barnes and Bloor aim at, namely:
反对
发表于 2025-3-24 15:00:23
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3134/313315/313315_18.png
沐浴
发表于 2025-3-24 21:09:10
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3134/313315/313315_19.png
Yourself
发表于 2025-3-24 23:22:50
Norm-Circularity,If the foregoing arguments are correct, we have good reason to think that the argument from underdetermination does not lead to the conclusion that Barnes and Bloor aim at, namely: