Repatriate
发表于 2025-3-23 10:05:30
Time and World Quantifiersreferred back to them by explicitly anaphoric phrases like ‘the first’, ‘the second’, and so on. So the next task is to integrate this way of referring to times and worlds with the multiply-indexed languages introduced in Chapters 3 and 13. The language ℒ, introduced in Chapter 13 is in fact a two-s
不法行为
发表于 2025-3-23 17:32:23
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3117/311653/311653_12.png
幸福愉悦感
发表于 2025-3-23 19:00:22
0924-4662our arrangements or that the solution to the problem required us to examine all the probable outcomes of our action. So it would seem that we speak as if in addition to eloeks, mountains, queens and grains of sand there are hitches, arrangements, solutions, probiems, and probable outcomes. It is no
多余
发表于 2025-3-24 00:41:15
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3117/311653/311653_14.png
Kidnap
发表于 2025-3-24 02:37:05
A History of Fertility in America,ll first sketch the view of anaphora presented in Chapter 10 of Cresswell 1988, and then shew how this treatment can be extended to deal with anaphoric reference to times and worlds. Anaphora in this chapter will be understood as able to apply over discourses comprising more than one sentence. Consider
高兴去去
发表于 2025-3-24 07:05:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3117/311653/311653_16.png
exquisite
发表于 2025-3-24 13:43:47
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-10503-7duals can also be given an indexical treatment using sentential operators. So if Part I can be used to shew that natural language does not quantify over possible worlds then Part III can be used to shew that it does not quantify over anything.
欢乐东方
发表于 2025-3-24 15:35:50
Generalized Quantifiersduals can also be given an indexical treatment using sentential operators. So if Part I can be used to shew that natural language does not quantify over possible worlds then Part III can be used to shew that it does not quantify over anything.
山崩
发表于 2025-3-24 19:34:17
Possibilist Quantificationfrequently held to be false on the ground that it assumes that exactly the same things exist in all possible worlds. For suppose that we are in world .. It may be that all the things which exist in . are φ in every world, but in a world . something which exists there but doesn’t exist in . is not φ.
尊严
发表于 2025-3-25 01:13:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3117/311653/311653_20.png