Phagocytes
发表于 2025-3-23 11:24:18
Summing Up,hoods. The socio-political context was presented in some detail in order to understand the constraints facing development and the issues of globalization of capitalism as it affects the local Basuto people. It provides an example of the questions we need to ask ourselves before embarking on any proj
相符
发表于 2025-3-23 14:35:10
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3111/311066/311066_12.png
大雨
发表于 2025-3-23 20:28:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3111/311066/311066_13.png
喷出
发表于 2025-3-23 23:57:52
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3111/311066/311066_14.png
Nerve-Block
发表于 2025-3-24 03:06:41
Book 2006ice within the engineering profession and how that is related to and implicated in social, economic and political issues. The series will include external relations between engineering, economic systems and social and political practices, as well as power structures and working conditions within the
VERT
发表于 2025-3-24 09:21:35
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3111/311066/311066_16.png
异端
发表于 2025-3-24 11:14:36
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3111/311066/311066_17.png
笨拙处理
发表于 2025-3-24 18:38:32
The History of US-Japan Relationst involved and those who are ‘users’? Who gets the jobs? Who makes decisions about pay and conditions? Do workers have to relocate? What effect does this have on their lives, their family’s lives and those of their community? Is the engineering project contributing in any way to the increasing gap b
Coronation
发表于 2025-3-24 19:44:30
How Responsible Is Engineering?,h characterising the rise of industrial capitalism’ and yet engineers ‘have generally ignored questions of the distribution of the resulting benefits and often even questions of the social character of production processes’ (Johnston . 2000, p. 534). Johnston goes on to quote from Goldman (1990, p.
chassis
发表于 2025-3-24 23:45:08
Public Understanding of Science and Technology,ey areas of work and tries to be objective. It states up front that ‘it is not the purpose of dialogue to intrude upon discussion amongst the science community about scientific knowledge. There is no suggestion that the progress of scientific ideas should be democratically decided’ even though they