Dignant
发表于 2025-3-23 11:35:25
,Thesenförmige Zusammenfassung,sdiction generally in seeking an answer. Thus, for instance, although the new U.K. Competition Act of 1980 has potential extraterritorial application on its face, recent OFT practices and the consistent attitude of the U.K. Courts over many years leads one to doubt whether it will be applied so as to include such cases in practice.
voluble
发表于 2025-3-23 15:15:48
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3106/310594/310594_12.png
轻率的你
发表于 2025-3-23 20:47:26
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3106/310594/310594_13.png
支形吊灯
发表于 2025-3-24 00:59:40
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3106/310594/310594_14.png
不知疲倦
发表于 2025-3-24 05:54:31
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3106/310594/310594_15.png
Metamorphosis
发表于 2025-3-24 07:49:23
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3106/310594/310594_16.png
石墨
发表于 2025-3-24 11:45:16
,Umweltregime für die europäischen Meere,s, which then take effect directly and are not required to be issued through the authority of a court (e.g. EEC, Germany), from those where antitrust agencies proceed through the medium of the courts in acting against the antitrust violators (e.g., USA, U.K.). Different again are those systems which
enhance
发表于 2025-3-24 18:18:53
Befragte Institutionen und Firmen, that State have the right to act within the territory. Thus an act of public authority of State A performed within the territory of State B, is an infringement of the Sovereignty of State B, unless previously consented to by the government or other designated authority of State B.
小丑
发表于 2025-3-24 20:25:34
Internationale Telekommunikation, there are various other procedures in certain jurisdictions whereby an undertaking situated abroad may be brought within domestic jurisdiction. As these various procedural methods occur in different national legal systems, it is proposed to examine them on a general basis giving such examples of their existence as lend clarity.
疼死我了
发表于 2025-3-25 02:47:06
Relevant principles of international law, that State have the right to act within the territory. Thus an act of public authority of State A performed within the territory of State B, is an infringement of the Sovereignty of State B, unless previously consented to by the government or other designated authority of State B.