琐事
发表于 2025-3-28 15:04:45
Universality and the categorical imperative,incentival maxims, or does it pertain to actional maxims? Finally, does Kant hold that this “supreme practical principle” (Gr. 428) has both functions? These are some of the chief questions to be considered in this chapter.
Bone-Scan
发表于 2025-3-28 21:49:19
The principle of humanity,omplished, but no systematic study of the principle as a moral principle — i.e., as a principle designed to guide action and as a criterion for distinguishing right conduct from wrong — has yet been undertaken. That Kant supposes that PH can serve as such a principle and criterion seems clear (see .
finite
发表于 2025-3-28 23:20:58
Duties, rights, and ends in the political order,om” (.., 230). “Every act is right [.] that in itself or in its maxim is such that the freedom of the will [.] of each can coexist together with the freedom of everyone in accordance with a universal law” (.., 230). And the universal law of right is: “act externally in such a way that the free use o
deface
发表于 2025-3-29 05:25:33
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3100/309971/309971_44.png
muscle-fibers
发表于 2025-3-29 11:00:00
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3100/309971/309971_45.png