indifferent 发表于 2025-3-23 11:17:40
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3089/308864/308864_11.png混合物 发表于 2025-3-23 17:15:16
Epistemic Foundationalism (I): Infinite Regresses, Externalism, and Reliabilism,position that is immediately justified. But since this assumption is the very point at issue in the debate between the foundationalist and the proponent of infinite justificatory regresses, the foundationalist cannot rely on the argument in question. We must determine, then, whether the foundationalBrochure 发表于 2025-3-23 21:30:54
Gerontopsychiatrische Störungen (F00–F01)interest to believe that he can swim to safety — for given that belief, he will continue to swim and might be rescued — he is, presumably, prudentially justified in believing that he can swim to safety. Clearly, if he had no such belief, he would probably drown immediately, without even trying to re收集 发表于 2025-3-23 23:47:55
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-09253-8 of their relations to other beliefs. Thus, on the coherentist solution to the regress problem no evidence chains terminate in immediately justified, foundational beliefs. In a sense, all justification is inferential.Adulterate 发表于 2025-3-24 02:26:03
Biographieforschung und Pflege,position that is immediately justified. But since this assumption is the very point at issue in the debate between the foundationalist and the proponent of infinite justificatory regresses, the foundationalist cannot rely on the argument in question. We must determine, then, whether the foundationalagnostic 发表于 2025-3-24 10:22:33
Book 1985empirical justification are many and varied, so also are the epistemological issues taken up in the following chapters. For instance, there will be questions about so-called coherence and its role, if any, in empirical justification. And there will be questions about social consensus (whatever it isProject 发表于 2025-3-24 13:19:27
0921-8599 will be questions about so-called coherence and its role, if any, in empirical justification. And there will be questions about social consensus (whatever it is978-90-277-2042-9978-94-009-4526-5Series ISSN 0921-8599 Series E-ISSN 2542-8349羽毛长成 发表于 2025-3-24 17:35:41
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3089/308864/308864_18.pngCLOT 发表于 2025-3-24 22:47:36
Epistemic Contextualism: Justification via the Unjustified,ot founded”.. If we construe Wittgenstein’s claim as stating that at the foundation of . beliefs lie beliefs that are ., then we have the first purported solution to the epistemic regress problem. The contextualist solution, like the foundationalist solution, proposes that evidence chains terminate,AVERT 发表于 2025-3-25 03:11:10
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3089/308864/308864_20.png