庇护 发表于 2025-3-26 21:22:07
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-6284-5anca’ in the history of international ideas in the late nineteenth century. The second part explains the main factors underlying the second Vitorian revival and the ensuing consolidation of the international reputation of Vitoria and the ‘Spanish classics’ as the forefathers of international law inenfeeble 发表于 2025-3-27 02:52:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3089/308835/308835_32.pngMercantile 发表于 2025-3-27 07:02:38
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3089/308835/308835_33.png丰满中国 发表于 2025-3-27 09:29:36
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3089/308835/308835_34.png青春期 发表于 2025-3-27 15:50:19
Outpatient Cardiac Catheterizationlysis reveals an important contrast between the more utopian position of Erasmus and the more realist (albeit firmly grounded in a Thomist natural law framework) perspective of Francisco de Vitoria. The chapter begins with an introductory section that provides an overview of the just war theory tradASTER 发表于 2025-3-27 19:52:25
Martin Kaltenbach,Christian Vallbracht his contemporaries, as they associated him with the creation of the Spanish Empire in the sixteenth century. However, views on Charles V changed in later centuries until he was seen in the nineteenth century as a distant emperor, who was cold, warfaring, foreign, proud and ruthless. Some authors co装饰 发表于 2025-3-27 22:47:32
José María BeneytoRepresents an innovative comparison of the thought of Vitoria and Erasmus.Offers a source of inspiration for the necessary deconstruction-reconstruction of contemporary international law.Presents contengagement 发表于 2025-3-28 05:35:49
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3089/308835/308835_38.png考古学 发表于 2025-3-28 08:30:48
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3089/308835/308835_39.png起来了 发表于 2025-3-28 12:13:05
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3089/308835/308835_40.png