Perceive
发表于 2025-3-23 13:37:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3081/308045/308045_11.png
琐事
发表于 2025-3-23 13:52:36
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5848-1ic practice, but that they have intrinsic value. I also argue that realism would promote and antirealism would forestall scientific progress if scientists adopted them as their philosophical frameworks.
laparoscopy
发表于 2025-3-23 20:40:26
Scientific Realism and Scientific Practice,ic practice, but that they have intrinsic value. I also argue that realism would promote and antirealism would forestall scientific progress if scientists adopted them as their philosophical frameworks.
Middle-Ear
发表于 2025-3-23 22:46:30
0166-6991 ow to provide influential formulations of scientific realism.This book provides philosophers of science with new theoretical resources for making their own contributions to the scientific realism debate. Readers will encounter old and new arguments for and against scientific realism. They will also
strain
发表于 2025-3-24 04:40:31
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-13793-0s’ beliefs in their own positive theories are unjustifiable. Moreover, epistemic reciprocalists would not believe antirealists’ theories. Antirealists might reply that they believe that T is empirically adequate or that there is a gap between what they say and what they believe. These replies are all problematic.
终止
发表于 2025-3-24 09:19:53
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65706-2ur beliefs about the world increases. I argue that the historical episode of Semmelweis accords well with the epistemic and evidential accounts, but not with the problem-solving, semantic, or noetic accounts of scientific progress. I also explore how each of the five rival accounts of scientific progress relates to realism and empiricism.
cuticle
发表于 2025-3-24 12:03:13
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3081/308045/308045_17.png
Atmosphere
发表于 2025-3-24 14:52:04
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3081/308045/308045_18.png
束缚
发表于 2025-3-24 19:32:37
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3081/308045/308045_19.png
deciduous
发表于 2025-3-25 02:43:27
New Topics for Future Debates,ebate on the geological debate between catastrophists and uniformitarians. I object that it is self-refuting for a pessimist to appeal to a scientific debate. Finally, I introduce several new topics for future debates between realists and antirealists, extracting most of them from previous chapters.