发表于 2025-3-23 09:48:14

1614-0311 serving paradoxical election outcome.Validates the theoreticThis monograph studies voting procedures based on the probability that paradoxical outcomes like the famous Condorcet Paradox might exist. It is well known that hypothetical examples of many different paradoxical election outcomes can be de

参考书目 发表于 2025-3-23 17:05:34

http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3057/305636/305636_12.png

TEM 发表于 2025-3-23 18:34:32

http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3057/305636/305636_13.png

Original 发表于 2025-3-23 23:20:25

http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3057/305636/305636_14.png

HAVOC 发表于 2025-3-24 05:51:11

http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3057/305636/305636_15.png

Anthropoid 发表于 2025-3-24 06:47:20

Mechanisms of Institutional Change,nclusion that the additional effort that is required to use a two-stage voting rule, rather than simply using Borda Rule, is not likely to be worthwhile. Other benefits are considered that result from using Borda Rule rather than a two-stage voting rule.

透明 发表于 2025-3-24 12:09:06

http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3057/305636/305636_17.png

optic-nerve 发表于 2025-3-24 18:14:15

Elections and Voting Paradoxes, probability that they might ever actually be observed in practice, to determine if they really pose a significant threat to the stability of elections or if they just reflect some interesting theoretical possibilities with a small number of candidates.

BARK 发表于 2025-3-24 22:51:45

http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3057/305636/305636_19.png

Wallow 发表于 2025-3-24 23:31:21

http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3057/305636/305636_20.png
页: 1 [2] 3 4
查看完整版本: Titlebook: Elections, Voting Rules and Paradoxical Outcomes; William V. Gehrlein,Dominique Lepelley Book 2017 Springer International Publishing AG 20