易于交谈
发表于 2025-3-27 00:55:26
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3055/305489/305489_31.png
食料
发表于 2025-3-27 03:20:43
The Suez Crisis,supplies, was vital to national survival. The US, on the other hand, did not see Nasser threatening anything so vital. Certainly, his influence in the region was inimical, and his actions seemed to be profiting the Soviet Union. However, an important element of pragmatism still remained in the US approach to dealing with him.
debble
发表于 2025-3-27 05:40:39
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230378971Anglo-American; cold war; intervention; nationalism; revolution
prosperity
发表于 2025-3-27 10:22:32
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3055/305489/305489_34.png
debunk
发表于 2025-3-27 17:27:23
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3055/305489/305489_35.png
CODA
发表于 2025-3-27 19:31:25
Studies in Military and Strategic Historyhttp://image.papertrans.cn/e/image/305489.jpg
ARY
发表于 2025-3-28 00:10:16
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3055/305489/305489_37.png
无王时期,
发表于 2025-3-28 02:12:30
,Perspektiven europäischer Geschichte,nt by a cadre of army officers, was the harbinger of far-reaching political changes which were to sweep the Arab world during the coming decade. In many respects, it seems fair to describe the period 1955–9 as a pivotal one in the post-war history of the region. Arab nationalist sentiment underwent
obsession
发表于 2025-3-28 09:36:41
Giuseppe Bonazzi,Veronika Tackeies wanted to protect access to the vast oil reserves of the region, and both thought that the principal threat to such access came ultimately from the Soviet Union. The importance of Middle Eastern oil to the economies of Western Europe was illustrated by British Government figures produced in earl
uveitis
发表于 2025-3-28 11:29:27
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-03759-6d Britain in the wake of their respective reorientations of policy in March 1956. As has been suggested, aside from the broader strategic divergence between the two over the question of the promotion of the Baghdad Pact and of Iraqi leadership of the Arab world, they had come to subtly, but signific