CARE
发表于 2025-3-26 22:47:57
Fernando Kawai,Daniel McFarlandional as possible. The next question to be considered is whether a judge should necessarily possess empathy, or whether this might not undermine impartiality and ultimately, in a similar way as cognitive biases, jeopardize the rationality of court judgements. The results of these two lines of inquiry are summed up in the conclusion.
决定性
发表于 2025-3-27 04:09:23
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3030/302956/302956_32.png
Grasping
发表于 2025-3-27 06:50:52
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3030/302956/302956_33.png
capsule
发表于 2025-3-27 10:48:24
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3030/302956/302956_34.png
追逐
发表于 2025-3-27 15:25:07
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60807-0 human life. The focus of interest is the question of whether and how any monetarization of human life can be justified from an ethical and legal viewpoint within the constellations described. The conclusion draws together the insights gained.
歪曲道理
发表于 2025-3-27 19:51:45
What Is It Like to Be Unborn?communities of fate, the law will be able to reach beyond the borders of its own limited system of concepts and realize that biodiversity does not serve solely economic utilization and social communication, but in addition carries a tangible (ecocentric) weight for physical survival in the future.
刺穿
发表于 2025-3-27 23:53:42
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3030/302956/302956_37.png
宽容
发表于 2025-3-28 04:24:48
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3030/302956/302956_38.png
组成
发表于 2025-3-28 06:52:36
Our Responsibility Towards Future Generationsake a – . – surprising comparison with Herbert Hart. Examination of the deficiencies of both perspectives opens up the avenue of transcendence which leads to a new orientation, at least an outline of which is put forward in conclusion.
MEN
发表于 2025-3-28 11:44:23
Consequence-Based Arguments in Legal Reasoning: A Jurisprudential Preface to ,of legal decisions will be considered. Referring to the philosophical, jurisprudential and institutional dimensions of the issue I will argue that in a modern constitutional democracy the scope of consequence-based judicial reasoning is limited mainly by the expertise of courts. A more general impli