colostrum
发表于 2025-3-26 23:21:29
a bias in favour of private spending which is no longer conducive to happiness socially. Welfare can be increased more by higher public spending on research and environmental protection, including the perfection of the techniques of brain stimulation to increase happiness.978-0-333-99277-7
covert
发表于 2025-3-27 03:19:56
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3030/302951/302951_32.png
线
发表于 2025-3-27 08:35:24
Introductionimplification in the formulation of public policy in general and in cost-benefit analysis in particular. Thus, no economist, at least no economist concerned with policy issues, can afford to ignore this argument.
有其法作用
发表于 2025-3-27 12:33:35
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3030/302951/302951_34.png
Gudgeon
发表于 2025-3-27 17:33:25
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48729-8he inefficiency of the public sector) underlying this movement, this chapter discusses some neglected factors that provide some offsetting considerations. Before doing so, the basic theory on the appropriate size of public spending on public goods and some related considerations are reviewed.
猜忌
发表于 2025-3-27 19:50:13
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3030/302951/302951_36.png
供过于求
发表于 2025-3-27 22:19:37
A Case for Higher Public Spendinghe inefficiency of the public sector) underlying this movement, this chapter discusses some neglected factors that provide some offsetting considerations. Before doing so, the basic theory on the appropriate size of public spending on public goods and some related considerations are reviewed.
Enervate
发表于 2025-3-28 02:21:25
Introductionroblem in the foundation of public economic policy. It appears in almost all fields of public economic policy. Yet, according to my argument explained in this book, it should basically only be confined to one area of public policy — the general tax/transfer system — though it remains an important pr
精密
发表于 2025-3-28 06:48:08
The Necessity of Interpersonal Cardinal Utilityher than your family members will be affected by your decisions. You do not hate any of the members and you care about all members. Thus, you believe that your decisions should depend on their (including your own, being a family member yourself) utilities. You also agree that if any one member is ma
amyloid
发表于 2025-3-28 10:48:39
Welfarismrences between utility and welfare, on which see Chapter 4. Questions of animal welfare and national boundary are also ignored.) Most people (including Sen) accept that individual welfares matter but many want to add other desiderata. While one may use any number of secondary instrumental principles