灯泡 发表于 2025-3-23 11:10:24
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3026/302514/302514_11.pngABOUT 发表于 2025-3-23 13:59:16
Palgrave Studies in Classical Liberalismhttp://image.papertrans.cn/e/image/302514.jpgIngenuity 发表于 2025-3-23 19:27:08
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3026/302514/302514_13.pngDIS 发表于 2025-3-24 01:17:40
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3026/302514/302514_14.png使厌恶 发表于 2025-3-24 04:32:26
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3026/302514/302514_15.png纪念 发表于 2025-3-24 07:49:03
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3026/302514/302514_16.png修剪过的树篱 发表于 2025-3-24 11:01:52
Conflict and Co-operation in Economicsurrently supplied by governments. Rothbard viewed the state as an agency that sought to obtain and retain power over citizens; state education was an instrument toward this goal. (In this, he shared much in common with education critics of the New Left) He argued that markets in educational servicesIrremediable 发表于 2025-3-24 15:08:59
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3026/302514/302514_18.png惊呼 发表于 2025-3-24 19:23:23
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403938367l system led him to lament the inflexibility and bureaucracy of the public school system, which, he believed, stemmed from the public school bureaucracy’s immulnity from competitive markets. Drawing on a “public choice” approach to economics, Lieberman went on to critique public school systems, argu桉树 发表于 2025-3-25 01:39:05
Godfrey Maringira,Rosette Sifa Vuningaore Sizer (1932–2009) favored markets in education from the belief that they’d enhance equity, preserve diversity, and keep schools under the control of those within them. John “Jack” Coons (1929–) and Stephen Sugarman (1942–) created a school choice plan they believed would fund education more equi