引导
发表于 2025-3-27 00:40:54
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3025/302442/302442_31.png
敌意
发表于 2025-3-27 02:01:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3025/302442/302442_32.png
flammable
发表于 2025-3-27 06:18:02
Bryan D. Springer,Brian M. Curtinory of Madness”, where Derrida argues against Foucault’s reading of Descartes’ reference to madness in the first chapter of his .. While Foucault claims that Descartes constitutes a dichotomous opposition between thought and madness, Derrida shows that madness finds its way into the Cartesian . and
领先
发表于 2025-3-27 12:13:04
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3025/302442/302442_34.png
fixed-joint
发表于 2025-3-27 16:39:31
them to appear more clearly. To that end, I examine the views of Adorno, Arendt, Deleuze, Derrida, and Rancière along the three main axes around which the book revolves: the conception of thinking, the relations between thinking and politics, and the possibility of education for thinking. The first
glamor
发表于 2025-3-27 21:19:27
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3025/302442/302442_36.png
推崇
发表于 2025-3-27 22:13:44
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3025/302442/302442_37.png
受伤
发表于 2025-3-28 04:09:54
10楼
碎石
发表于 2025-3-28 09:33:29
10楼
共栖
发表于 2025-3-28 11:39:35
10楼