Evocative 发表于 2025-3-25 06:11:27
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3023/302298/302298_21.pngaccomplishment 发表于 2025-3-25 10:01:47
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3023/302298/302298_22.pngPRO 发表于 2025-3-25 14:52:39
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3023/302298/302298_23.pngexclamation 发表于 2025-3-25 16:03:55
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3023/302298/302298_24.pngPelvic-Floor 发表于 2025-3-25 20:51:00
Claims for Secession and Federalismrical and scriptural detail. In it, I interrogate a critical propensity (especially compelling in Spenser studies) to distrust figuration, particularly allegory and anthropomorphism, in the context of literary animals. Rather than equating the ‘literal’ to the material or immediate and reducing figuBABY 发表于 2025-3-26 01:22:55
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3023/302298/302298_26.pngGlutinous 发表于 2025-3-26 08:19:15
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71350-2e. If not quite constituting characters or agents, I argue that horses have a vital connection to the movement of the poem itself, enabling narrative progression and acting as sensitive registers of what Paul Ricoeur terms narrative ‘followability’. Spenser’s poem courses forwards in linear fashion,易于出错 发表于 2025-3-26 10:27:39
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3023/302298/302298_28.png不理会 发表于 2025-3-26 14:41:14
Jane Kenway,Johannah Fahey,Fazal Rizvis of early modern English literature and discovers new ways of thinking about German sixteenth-century images of horses. The Coda demonstrates how the bodies of animals, variously conceived and encountered in history and in scholarship, provide a unique foundation for the practice of interdisciplinaFlat-Feet 发表于 2025-3-26 16:48:31
Rachel Stenner,Abigail ShinnDemonstrates engagement with animals in early modern literature beyond Shakespeare.Connects animal studies as a critical approach with early modern scholarship.Addresses topics of monstrosity, genre,