custody 发表于 2025-3-30 10:05:01
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3587-0 barriers separating artisans from scholars in Europe were broken around 1600, but in the explanation of . this came about. Zilsel’s original proposal appears to lack an historically grounded explanation of the modes of interaction between these two diverse social groups. This chapter aims at overco清楚说话 发表于 2025-3-30 12:54:37
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3023/302224/302224_52.png针叶类的树 发表于 2025-3-30 16:51:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3023/302224/302224_53.pngMAUVE 发表于 2025-3-30 22:24:07
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3023/302224/302224_54.png生来 发表于 2025-3-31 01:09:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3023/302224/302224_55.pngAND 发表于 2025-3-31 06:34:07
Zilsel: Reconnecting with an Intellectual Legacy That Deserves to Be Revivedw journal and explains how the intentions of the editors refer to the work and life of Edgar Zilsel. Zilsel’s scientific strategy of theorizing the historical developments of modern science continues to inspire our approach in the ever-expanding field of social studies of science and technology.CON 发表于 2025-3-31 10:15:49
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3023/302224/302224_57.png一窝小鸟 发表于 2025-3-31 14:05:01
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3023/302224/302224_58.png是剥皮 发表于 2025-3-31 19:37:09
Edgar Zilsel: Philosopher, Historian, Sociologist978-3-030-93687-7Series ISSN 0929-6328 Series E-ISSN 2215-1818Popcorn 发表于 2025-4-1 01:24:19
Fred M. Ssewamala,Ozge Sensoy Baharis socio-historical investigation of 1926..Here I will investigate the modes and meanings of the neutral stance Zilsel took in this book and highlight the intellectual profit it can bring. In doing so I will also consider the issue of neutrality in present-day social science, or at least of social science in France.