MAUVE
发表于 2025-3-27 00:49:14
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3021/302041/302041_31.png
含铁
发表于 2025-3-27 04:18:53
‘Your Little Game’: Myth and War in Technological externalities are nonmarket interdependencies among economic activities. Consider, for example, two production activities . and ..
谎言
发表于 2025-3-27 07:45:03
Spectral Texts in Mansfield ParkGlobal environmental media are jointly used as a public good by the world as a whole. Diffusion processes are not too important. Examples are the ozone layer and the global warming of the atmosphere. Instead of the diffusion function 12.1, Eq. 12.2 holds defining an international public good.
intangibility
发表于 2025-3-27 10:54:16
Using the Environment — An Allocation ProblemTechnological externalities are nonmarket interdependencies among economic activities. Consider, for example, two production activities . and ..
摇曳
发表于 2025-3-27 15:44:20
Global Environmental MediaGlobal environmental media are jointly used as a public good by the world as a whole. Diffusion processes are not too important. Examples are the ozone layer and the global warming of the atmosphere. Instead of the diffusion function 12.1, Eq. 12.2 holds defining an international public good.
COKE
发表于 2025-3-27 19:08:44
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3021/302041/302041_36.png
调色板
发表于 2025-3-28 01:50:18
environment reduces environmental quality, and a better environmen tal quality implies that the environment‘s use as a receptacle of waste has to be restrained. Consequently, environmental disruption and environmental use are by nature allocation problems. This is the basic message of this book.978-3-662-03127-8
Aura231
发表于 2025-3-28 05:31:04
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137402004mal allocation requires individualized prices of environmental quality to be assessed according to the individual’s willingness to pay. If individuals are not inclined to reveal their true willingness to pay, we have to look into institutional arrangements that may reveal and aggregate individual pr
溺爱
发表于 2025-3-28 07:14:33
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230210738as a receptacle of waste into a private good by assigning property rights for emissions is consistent with both approaches. Whereas the public-goods approach suggests that, because of the nature of public goods, property rights cannot be specified, the property-rights approach is more optimistic in
floaters
发表于 2025-3-28 13:17:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3021/302041/302041_40.png