forbid
发表于 2025-3-28 16:19:55
Marx and Market Socialismir position even more bluntly: ‘The seizure of the means of production by society puts an end to commodity production … replaced by conscious organization on a planned basis’ (Engels, 1939, p. 309). Clearly, neither Marx nor Engels saw any role for markets in a socialist society.
阶层
发表于 2025-3-28 20:26:39
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3020/301942/301942_42.png
做方舟
发表于 2025-3-29 00:52:24
ions of conventional theory, finding no place there for history. The essays first explore methodology, then technology in relation to history, the politics inherent in economics, and finally, turn to the great Classics, interpreted in relation to modern questions.978-1-349-22572-9
只有
发表于 2025-3-29 03:45:16
https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47520-0ets, as evidenced both by the success of the Four Tigers in East Asia and by the better growth record in the US and the UK than in European countries suffering from Eurosclerosis (legislation and customs that inhibit economic flexibility), much less the miserable experience of the Soviets.
内部
发表于 2025-3-29 07:33:03
The Physical Burden of Immunoperception, interpretation of the beginning of ., even though suggested by Marx himself, seems, on the face of it, untenable. Because the commodity form is not unique to capitalism, it does not seem possible that an analysis of this form could disclose the determinate character of capitalism.
restrain
发表于 2025-3-29 12:12:36
Knute A. Fisher,Walther Stoeckeniusdisamenities associated with their work has stubbornly defied empirical verification. One explanation for this resistance to empirical tests, the efficiency wage theory, holds that the moral hazard involved in eliciting labour effort imposes a distorting layer of rents on the structure of pay.
helper-T-cells
发表于 2025-3-29 16:19:33
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3020/301942/301942_47.png
同位素
发表于 2025-3-29 20:56:50
C. Kalidas,M.V. Sangaranarayananand the firm; inappropriate methodology for considering time and history; confused and unsatisfactory theories of capital, distribution, prices, growth and trade; ideology rather than analysis guiding policy; and, above all, no clear idea of what it is all about — no adequate answer to the question, what is more wealth .?
AUGER
发表于 2025-3-30 03:26:26
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3020/301942/301942_49.png
Mumble
发表于 2025-3-30 07:33:46
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3020/301942/301942_50.png