善辩
发表于 2025-3-25 03:54:00
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3019/301896/301896_21.png
恃强凌弱
发表于 2025-3-25 07:44:52
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3019/301896/301896_22.png
malapropism
发表于 2025-3-25 13:14:16
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3019/301896/301896_23.png
companion
发表于 2025-3-25 19:08:36
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3019/301896/301896_24.png
forager
发表于 2025-3-25 22:06:53
Hermeneutics, Subjectivity, and the Lester/Machlup Debate: Toward a More Anthropological Approach t that shows us what understanding is, how it happens, and what it depends on, this question can be rephrased: How well do economists understand understanding? What difference would it make to our scholarly practices if economics were to become more hermeneutically sophisticated in this respect?
直觉没有
发表于 2025-3-26 01:11:10
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3019/301896/301896_26.png
genesis
发表于 2025-3-26 04:31:29
The Textbook Presentation of Economic Discourse,mulas does not make much sense. Even though they are constantly bombarded with abstractions in their cultural environment, the thinking in abstract terms that economists do is not natural to most students. The incongruity with common talk makes economics hard.
BET
发表于 2025-3-26 12:08:17
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3019/301896/301896_28.png
珊瑚
发表于 2025-3-26 13:05:25
Biochemistry of Brain and Behavior(1966) terminology. They are conceptual frameworks by which order is imposed upon, and moral legitimacy accorded to, the raw stuff out of which social understanding must be forged (Heilbroner, 1973; 1985, Chapter 5; and 1988, Chapters 1 and 8.)
定点
发表于 2025-3-26 18:25:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3019/301896/301896_30.png