QUAIL
发表于 2025-3-25 06:16:48
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3019/301827/301827_21.png
幼稚
发表于 2025-3-25 11:33:04
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3019/301827/301827_22.png
famine
发表于 2025-3-25 12:03:54
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3019/301827/301827_23.png
格言
发表于 2025-3-25 18:37:04
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3019/301827/301827_24.png
NIB
发表于 2025-3-25 23:26:47
The Development of the Theory of Games at Princeton and the Rand Corporation Schelling’s contributions to a reorientation of game theory are examined, which pays attention to strategic activities, in particular to things like promises and threats, tacit bargaining, the role of communication, design of enforceable contracts and rules, the tactics by which individuals or firms or governments commit themselves credibly.
欢乐中国
发表于 2025-3-26 03:32:19
Great Theoretical Controversies controversy which involved economists of the two Cambridges (Cambridge, England, and Cambridge, Massachusetts) in a debate which concerned the measurement of capital goods in a way consistent with the requirements of neoclassical economic theory.
finale
发表于 2025-3-26 06:11:55
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50222-4Economic theory; History of economic thought; Post-war economics; economics of neoclassical synthesis; h
Common-Migraine
发表于 2025-3-26 10:58:42
978-3-031-50224-8The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
牛的细微差别
发表于 2025-3-26 14:48:53
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17048-5story and the early 1970s, when the Bretton Woods system collapsed and the New Golden Age of capitalism came to an end and stagflation set in. Then a synthesis of the development of economic theory is presented: those years were characterized by the emergence of the postwar mainstream, as a result o
神经
发表于 2025-3-26 18:32:58
Disposition in der Betriebsabwicklung,aul Samuelson, Robert Solow, Franco Modigliani and many other eminent economists made MIT the main center of the neoclassical synthesis in the United States and world. Samuelson’s ., the end point of the evolution of analytical economics from Walras and Pareto to Hicks, is carefully analyzed. The an