Provenance
发表于 2025-3-26 23:40:38
Alfred Brink,Ursula Ernst-Auch,Volker Zwicktic tradition precisely amounts and therefore no agreed ‘yardstick’ with which to analyse Labour’s strategy and achievements. Likewise, there is no agreement about the nature of Labour itself and the distribution of power inside it. Instead academics and others have differed in their interpretation of how the party’s constitution operates.
笨拙的我
发表于 2025-3-27 01:57:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3019/301801/301801_32.png
Sad570
发表于 2025-3-27 07:59:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3019/301801/301801_33.png
维持
发表于 2025-3-27 11:05:42
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3019/301801/301801_34.png
Presbycusis
发表于 2025-3-27 14:22:49
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3019/301801/301801_35.png
habitat
发表于 2025-3-27 21:00:08
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3019/301801/301801_36.png
Lamina
发表于 2025-3-28 00:20:40
,Labour in Office, 1974–79,hers at the Department of Industry after March 1974. I look at the impact of these industrial policies in practice and I consider to what extent the party’s strategy was shaped by the difficult economic circumstances that the government encountered. I also examine the developing relationships between the Labour government and the wider party.
MODE
发表于 2025-3-28 04:18:47
Conclusions,s internal structure, policy-making machinery and the content of its economic strategy. I discuss these developments, which dominated Kinnock’s nine-year leadership of the party, in the Epilogue following.
ROOF
发表于 2025-3-28 08:37:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3019/301801/301801_39.png
BLA
发表于 2025-3-28 13:49:34
Der Blick auf den IT-Arbeitsmarkt,ved in three years of hard work.’. Labour’s rightwing leaders made no attempt to conceal their hostility and contempt towards the new policies. One of the party’s foremost intellectuals, Tony Crosland, argued that . was ‘written by people who didn’t live in the real world’.