序曲
发表于 2025-3-26 22:33:37
Instruments of Economic Reform in China however, to a significant extent on the expediency of these instruments, on how elaborate and coordinated they are, and, last but not least, on how much the social environment can be influenced and how receptive it is. Every factor comprises both objective and subjective elements.
olfction
发表于 2025-3-27 02:44:42
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3018/301774/301774_32.png
indignant
发表于 2025-3-27 07:16:02
Introductioneir own language (that is, descendants of the Han empire, — have lived for more than two thousand years in the belief that their country is the center of the civilized world, and that their civilization is superior to that of the “barbarian” peoples living in other parts of the world. The name of Ch
NOT
发表于 2025-3-27 12:13:10
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3018/301774/301774_34.png
平常
发表于 2025-3-27 16:03:31
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3018/301774/301774_35.png
ANA
发表于 2025-3-27 18:15:41
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3018/301774/301774_36.png
含糊
发表于 2025-3-28 01:06:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3018/301774/301774_37.png
观察
发表于 2025-3-28 02:07:30
Slowdown of the Reform Process (1987–1988)e the reform policies were taking shape, these attacks and manifestations presented no serious obstacles and appeared to be merely caviling by cadres who could not rid themselves of the old ways of thinking and the command methods they had become accustomed to. The main reason for their insignifican
Iniquitous
发表于 2025-3-28 06:34:17
The Reform Process Comes to a Sudden Halt (1989)ed at “control of the economic environment and restoration of economic order” (henceforth: controlling and putting in order) had not brought the desired result in the short run. Not only did the centralized measures squeezing the supply of money and credit cause difficulties in the first quarter of
visceral-fat
发表于 2025-3-28 13:35:56
Theoretical Bases of Chinese Economic Reformnd became distorted in the late 1950s in consequence of the willful policy of the “Great Leap,” was recognized by the best economists and policy makers of the People’s Republic of China in the early 1960s.. In the prevailing ideological and political atmosphere this recognition was not able to sprea