山顶可休息 发表于 2025-3-23 12:54:48
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-42347-9ar understanding of the ‘social interest’ in terms of their implications for freedom and democracy in the political system. The basic question is the relationship between individual and group ‘private’ interests and the ‘social interest’.mitten 发表于 2025-3-23 17:43:01
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-31672-6to have significant formative impact on their respective Communist Parties. These contrasts persisted under the surface of the enforced uniformity of their political and economic organisational patterns, which followed the establishment of communist single-party regimes in 1948. Both countries inherEXUDE 发表于 2025-3-23 20:07:24
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3018/301771/301771_13.pngsultry 发表于 2025-3-24 00:23:49
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3018/301771/301771_14.pngchondromalacia 发表于 2025-3-24 04:40:28
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-40178-1reservation of political stability, in the face of convincing evidence that the old, centralised economic system was unable to produce the economic results on which, ultimately, the legitimacy of the regimes rested. However, the experience of actually implementing reform in Czechoslovakia was to beIRATE 发表于 2025-3-24 09:07:21
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-26615-1of that political change was the consolidation of Kádár’s personal authority in the early 1960s, and with it, the imposition of a more flexible, pragmatic general approach to policy and the incorporation of expert advice into policy formulation. Such political change provided an adequate environmentaesthetic 发表于 2025-3-24 13:38:10
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3018/301771/301771_17.pngexacerbate 发表于 2025-3-24 14:54:04
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-29316-4 give no information on relative scarcity. Thus there would be no possibility of calculating costs of production, and therefore no possibility of producing the commodities identified as needed in an efficient, economical way:overture 发表于 2025-3-24 22:36:44
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-31672-6t of the majority, to socialistic ideologies. In Hungary, however, the development of democratic institutions took second place to the achievement of Magyar autonomy; in the wake of the 1919 communist revolution socialism, which never won majority support, was rejected as an alien creed, hostile to the national cause.gimmick 发表于 2025-3-24 23:17:12
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3018/301771/301771_20.png