Magnitude
发表于 2025-3-23 12:49:23
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3018/301750/301750_11.png
出来
发表于 2025-3-23 14:19:37
The Supply Side and Competitiveness,ended to improve the ability of British companies to compete in the international economy. This emphasis on a range of supply-side measures has been continued under New Labour, notably in the 2001 joint paper from the Treasury and the Department of Trade and Industry, . (HM Treasury, 2001).
overrule
发表于 2025-3-23 20:07:39
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3018/301750/301750_13.png
恫吓
发表于 2025-3-23 22:42:51
J. Huttenlocher,P. Smiley,H. Ratner1). In any event, this is not simply an academic debate about appropriate labels; globalization constrains the range of economic policy options available to nation states, and the most extreme versions would deny any autonomy to the nation state in economic policy matters at all.
灯泡
发表于 2025-3-24 05:15:08
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3018/301750/301750_15.png
Fatten
发表于 2025-3-24 08:31:02
Gradient, Potential, PotentialfunktionCabinet to be excluded altogether from important decisions. For example, between 1964 and 1966 it was a triumvirate of three ministers dominated by the prime minister ‘and not the Cabinet that settled major issues of economic policy’ (Cairncross, 1996, p. 99). The key issue of devaluation was kept away from the Cabinet altogether.
BLINK
发表于 2025-3-24 12:55:44
Globalization and Europeanization,1). In any event, this is not simply an academic debate about appropriate labels; globalization constrains the range of economic policy options available to nation states, and the most extreme versions would deny any autonomy to the nation state in economic policy matters at all.
平息
发表于 2025-3-24 15:47:46
Public Expenditure and Taxation,were shown a table that placed Britain fourteenth out of 20 advanced countries in terms of total tax in terms of GDP (35 per cent in 1997), the initial reaction of many respondents was disbelief (.., p. 14).
Liability
发表于 2025-3-24 20:23:49
Economic Policy-Making,Cabinet to be excluded altogether from important decisions. For example, between 1964 and 1966 it was a triumvirate of three ministers dominated by the prime minister ‘and not the Cabinet that settled major issues of economic policy’ (Cairncross, 1996, p. 99). The key issue of devaluation was kept away from the Cabinet altogether.
慷慨不好
发表于 2025-3-25 00:20:38
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3018/301750/301750_20.png