吞食 发表于 2025-3-21 16:15:52
书目名称Economic Objects and the Objects of Economics影响因子(影响力)<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0301722<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Economic Objects and the Objects of Economics影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0301722<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Economic Objects and the Objects of Economics网络公开度<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0301722<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Economic Objects and the Objects of Economics网络公开度学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0301722<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Economic Objects and the Objects of Economics被引频次<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0301722<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Economic Objects and the Objects of Economics被引频次学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0301722<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Economic Objects and the Objects of Economics年度引用<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0301722<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Economic Objects and the Objects of Economics年度引用学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0301722<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Economic Objects and the Objects of Economics读者反馈<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0301722<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Economic Objects and the Objects of Economics读者反馈学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0301722<br><br> <br><br>曲解 发表于 2025-3-21 23:07:10
Virtues and Economicshttp://image.papertrans.cn/e/image/301722.jpg注意 发表于 2025-3-22 00:44:46
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3018/301722/301722_3.pngconception 发表于 2025-3-22 04:52:28
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4302-0691-0ts the human judgment that brought it into being. The fundamental ontological diffence between objects found in nature and objects resulting from human intentionality are explored. The domestication of the techniques employed in the natural sciences cannot produce law-like generalisations in economi使腐烂 发表于 2025-3-22 11:50:16
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3018/301722/301722_5.pngcardiopulmonary 发表于 2025-3-22 13:04:44
Berik I. Tuleuov,Ademi B. Ospanova assessments of the situation are leading to any improvements. The reason for this lack of progress, I argue, is a prevalence of a set of fallacies maintained very often by mainstream practitioners and heterodox critics alike. These tend to take the form of presuppositions that underpin more explicicardiopulmonary 发表于 2025-3-22 20:32:14
,Introducing Fundamental Types of Data,he same species of cognitive inquiry as the natural sciences. Among other limits, the paper explores social scientific naturalism only with respect to economics. The social sciences are not homogeneous, and although many of the things I shall say apply to psychology, political science, sociology, an不开心 发表于 2025-3-22 23:51:25
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-9343-0 critics of economics (which includes a large proportion of philosophers and professors with a religious bent) and defenders of what, for lack of a better term, I will call mainstream economics. The problem is that when critics attack economics, their attack generally focuses on the one-dimensionalEngulf 发表于 2025-3-23 03:43:41
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3018/301722/301722_9.pngPaleontology 发表于 2025-3-23 05:59:05
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4302-0225-7tives, such as gratitude, fidelity, and many forms of honesty. Attempts to describe the actions and decisions of those acting from such motives in the terms of rational choice theory fail, and the model of human conduct which is implicit in the theory is both inadequate in itself and pernicious in i