Aphorism
发表于 2025-3-23 11:00:05
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3017/301667/301667_11.png
palpitate
发表于 2025-3-23 15:25:35
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3017/301667/301667_12.png
PAC
发表于 2025-3-23 21:25:23
Book 2015 1970s to 22.46 percent in 2012 a 144 percent increase. What is driving this astronomic growth in incomes for some? Is it possibly the result of non-meritorious forces? If so, how has this incredibly unequal development coexisted, and indeed worsened, in a political system based on equality?In Econo
整洁漂亮
发表于 2025-3-23 22:48:28
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3017/301667/301667_14.png
流浪者
发表于 2025-3-24 05:23:53
Changing the Rules of the Game,those at the top made possible and probably explain the increase in CEO vis-à-vis workers’ compensation in the non-financial sector. Income inequality that exists from this dynamic is not only the result of different social worth but also the result of intra-firm power dynamics.
啪心儿跳动
发表于 2025-3-24 09:08:35
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3017/301667/301667_16.png
执
发表于 2025-3-24 13:00:14
Basic Principles of Forensic Chemistryajority. At the same time, the income share of the top 1 percent was rising, and, at the end of both of these periods or the farthest point reached during the current period, the income share of the top 1 percent reached a high in US history. Nondemocratic elements of our political system played a central during both periods.
KIN
发表于 2025-3-24 16:49:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3017/301667/301667_18.png
挖掘
发表于 2025-3-24 19:02:25
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3017/301667/301667_19.png
四目在模仿
发表于 2025-3-25 00:10:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3017/301667/301667_20.png