圆柱
发表于 2025-3-23 13:33:08
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3017/301604/301604_11.png
Scleroderma
发表于 2025-3-23 16:09:31
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3017/301604/301604_12.png
AXIS
发表于 2025-3-23 19:22:18
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3017/301604/301604_13.png
Needlework
发表于 2025-3-24 02:07:45
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-10780-2belief that a key role of government is to keep us safe from discrimination, arguing that the ethical foundations of coercive schemes cannot be evaluated purely by reference to their stated goals and noble intentions but should consider also their implications for individual liberty.
CEDE
发表于 2025-3-24 03:54:15
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3017/301604/301604_15.png
BOAST
发表于 2025-3-24 07:44:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3017/301604/301604_16.png
无弹性
发表于 2025-3-24 14:08:30
Dirk Schmidt,Sebastian Heilmannts Rawls’s stylised and partisan definition of ‘public reason’ as the appropriate starting point in understanding the meaning of justice, and argues that formal equality as defined within the classical ideal of justice is essential to the rule of law.
Inkling
发表于 2025-3-24 18:06:20
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3017/301604/301604_18.png
WAIL
发表于 2025-3-24 19:00:18
Einleitung: Spinner oder Wegweiser?,lisation measures that paradoxically undermine the very principles of equality it purports to endorse. The chapter argues that employment rights ought instead to be vindicated through principles of reasonableness, fairness and due process.
油膏
发表于 2025-3-25 01:37:03
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3017/301604/301604_20.png