徽章
发表于 2025-3-21 17:31:28
书目名称Economic Dynamics, Trade and Growth影响因子(影响力)<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0301573<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Economic Dynamics, Trade and Growth影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0301573<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Economic Dynamics, Trade and Growth网络公开度<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0301573<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Economic Dynamics, Trade and Growth网络公开度学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0301573<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Economic Dynamics, Trade and Growth被引频次<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0301573<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Economic Dynamics, Trade and Growth被引频次学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0301573<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Economic Dynamics, Trade and Growth年度引用<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0301573<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Economic Dynamics, Trade and Growth年度引用学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0301573<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Economic Dynamics, Trade and Growth读者反馈<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0301573<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Economic Dynamics, Trade and Growth读者反馈学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0301573<br><br> <br><br>
Modify
发表于 2025-3-21 22:22:15
The Harrod-Domar Equation from Quesnay to Marx to Harrod and Domar,eynesian revolution. He was close to Keynes from 1922 onwards and he saw the galley proofs of . in 1935. He was at the same time working independently on . which he published in 1936, a few months after Keynes’s book. This contained the nucleus of his new dynamic economics which emerged as ‘An Essay
Minatory
发表于 2025-3-22 02:09:16
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3016/301573/301573_3.png
愉快么
发表于 2025-3-22 06:56:58
,In Search of Harrod’s Contribution to Economic Dynamics: A Note,rature on the topic, the ambiguity with which his work has been received is evident. In fact, once original pieces of analysis are identified in his abundant and informal writings, they have been immediately criticized, denied any empirical relevance, and reduced to a very specific theoretical conte
Fresco
发表于 2025-3-22 12:08:17
,Harrod and the ‘Time-lag Theories of the Cycle’, of economic change. At an early stage he disapproved of the psychological theories of the cycle; in . he criticized the ‘time-lag theories of the cycle’, particularly Robertson’s lagged relationship between income and saving; he rejected Lundberg’s method of period analysis, and subsequently refute
Myocarditis
发表于 2025-3-22 13:39:59
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3016/301573/301573_6.png
Myocarditis
发表于 2025-3-22 18:16:29
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3016/301573/301573_7.png
forbid
发表于 2025-3-22 23:09:31
,Cumulative Causation, Harrod’s Trade Multiplier, and Kaldor’s Paradox: The Foundations of Post-Keynd often passionately) pursued since the very beginning of modern economic thought. One of the controversial issues in the ‘great debates’ between free traders and protectionists, convergence and cumulative causation theorists, paladins of a world . and proponents of a new economic order and, more re
表脸
发表于 2025-3-23 03:25:34
Harrod and Haberler Beyond The Trade Cycle: Exchanges on International Liquidity, Gold, Trade, Inflrs of intuitive insight into complex problems of political economy in the broad sense … and the relevance of his arguments … and his contributions to our understanding of the issues involved’ in the international monetary situation between 1953 and 1970. As early as 1953, in his report for the IMF o
放弃
发表于 2025-3-23 06:29:22
,In Search of Harrod’s Contribution to Economic Dynamics: A Note,nt. This Note will argue that Harrod’s critics have been not sufficiently perceptive of his originality, since his approach has been felt to be ‘discomforting’.. Yet, if Harrod’s analysis is read more accurately, an interesting concept of economic dynamics emerges.