Carminative 发表于 2025-3-27 00:33:16
Divine Impassibility in Eastern Patristic Thought: Origen of Alexandria and Gregory Thaumaturguss become hostile to the traditional notion that God is impassible. With very few exceptions, the contemporary debate over divine impassibility has taken place in what he calls a ‘Western arena’ with very little input from the Eastern tradition. To fill this lacuna, Compton draws upon the resources o尾巴 发表于 2025-3-27 02:08:04
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3011/301005/301005_32.png允许 发表于 2025-3-27 06:42:12
Warranted Eastern Christian Belief: Extending Plantinga’s Extended AC Modeltian belief, can be .. They do this by creatively bringing recent work on religious experience, in the context of the Divine Liturgy, into conversation with Alvin Plantinga’s well-known explication of Reformed Epistemology. What emerges is a distinctly Eastern Christian approach to warranted Christi小歌剧 发表于 2025-3-27 12:49:44
The Mystery of Words: Orthodox Theology and Philosophy of Languagemeaning must take into consideration the object in the world that a term or linguistic sign refers to (i.e., .), the relationship between the sign and the sign-user (i.e., .), and the sense or aspect under which the object is being interpreted (i.e., .). Schneider argues that the twentieth-century’sforbid 发表于 2025-3-27 15:50:12
Agency and Responsibility: Ecologically Inflected Insights from the Syriac Traditionge, seem to transcend traditional ethical categories of individual agency and autonomy. Some thinkers have proposed extending agency to the non-human or even the material, but such attempts often make it difficult to continue insisting on human responsibility or culpability for harmful actions. This独裁政府 发表于 2025-3-27 20:07:34
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3011/301005/301005_36.pngharpsichord 发表于 2025-3-27 23:52:20
Christian Philosophy as a Philosophy of Crisis: Re-reading Florensky in the Twenty-First Centuryisis permeating the first decades of the twenty-first century. In her exploration of Florensky’s thought, Clemena defends two contentious claims. First, she argues that, in contrast to what many scholars believe, Florensky was not a theologian but, rather, a religious philosopher. Second, she arguesnettle 发表于 2025-3-28 03:13:00
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3011/301005/301005_38.pngMonotonous 发表于 2025-3-28 06:54:52
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3011/301005/301005_39.png高歌 发表于 2025-3-28 14:11:33
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3011/301005/301005_40.png