人充满活力 发表于 2025-3-23 12:17:55
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3010/300983/300983_11.png陈列 发表于 2025-3-23 15:41:46
,Part I: After the Turn, 1990–91,heir nation, the GDR (German Democratic Republic); the simultaneous end of their nearly universally shared dream of a socialist world succeeding capitalism; and the realization that it was capitalist West Germany, not the GDR, that had “won” the struggle for German national identity and economic surMelanoma 发表于 2025-3-23 21:36:26
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3010/300983/300983_13.pngAVERT 发表于 2025-3-23 23:29:15
Part III: Theoretical Perspectives,ure; Pierre Bourdieu’s model of the distribution of power and capital in the field and habitus of society; and Erving Goffman’s discussion of stigma. Hirschman’s model explains how the Turn meant that the “exit” option allowed only for emigration, the “voice” option was eliminated by the 1990 vote iaerobic 发表于 2025-3-24 03:16:23
East German Intellectuals and the Unification of GermanyAn Ethnographic Viewcurriculum 发表于 2025-3-24 07:35:33
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3010/300983/300983_16.pngBILL 发表于 2025-3-24 14:38:13
Book 2017ount of how the intellectuals of East Germany reacted to the demise of their nation, their “dream” of a socialist world, and unification with capitalist West Germany. Part I covers unification, 1990-91; Part II presents a quarter century later follow-up with one-fourth of those interviewed in 1990-9intrude 发表于 2025-3-24 18:44:51
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3010/300983/300983_18.png闷热 发表于 2025-3-24 21:46:02
IMF Conditionality and Socio-Economic Impact(die Wende), a shorthand to describe the end of the socialist GDR and its unification with capitalist West Germany. Second, it describes the logic of carrying out this ethnographic research project, from its first phase in 1990-91 to the follow up interviews with East German intellectuals a quarter century later, in 2014.incisive 发表于 2025-3-25 01:41:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3010/300983/300983_20.png