Mosaic
发表于 2025-3-28 15:56:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3008/300777/300777_41.png
政府
发表于 2025-3-28 19:16:38
Sebastian Oetzel,Andreas Luppoldbove national context” back on the agenda.1 As he rightly observes, over the past twenty years much scholarly attention has been devoted to the study of Enlightenment in national contexts. Taking the Scottish Enlightenment as an example, Robertson first points to the interpretative gains of the nati
人工制品
发表于 2025-3-29 01:19:48
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3008/300777/300777_43.png
frivolous
发表于 2025-3-29 05:43:59
0066-6610of research in early modern intellectual history. In recent years there have been substantial reassessments of Grotius, Pufendorf, Thomasius 1 and the whole university-based tradition associated with the Frühaujklärung. The appeal of the discourse of natural jurisprudence to groups and individuals
insolence
发表于 2025-3-29 10:15:39
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3008/300777/300777_45.png
Dysplasia
发表于 2025-3-29 13:44:43
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91017-8 most renowned moral and political theorists of his day end up with a philosophically confused and morally repulsive doctrine.. In the research literature, this “repulsive” doctrine has now come to be known as “voluntarism,” and Pufendorf is generally accepted as one of its most central and clear-cut defenders in the early-modern period.
允许
发表于 2025-3-29 16:38:59
Natural Jurisprudence, Argument from History and Constitutional Struggle in the Early Enlightenmentreignty was in no way contradictory, as Schröder had claimed. In contrast, since the power of monarchs was similar to the power of magistrates in any form of republic it had always to be based on contract and always to be approved by God..