小卒
发表于 2025-3-25 03:48:41
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3008/300765/300765_21.png
Bouquet
发表于 2025-3-25 09:18:49
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-01505-3om rejecting neoclassicism, embraces the imaginative power of conjectured, off-stage scenes, purging these of their libidinal and prodigal associations. The chapter looks at debt and doorways in Plautus, Ariosto and Shakespeare.
FRET
发表于 2025-3-25 13:50:28
Oliver Deiser,Caroline Lasser,Dirk Wernerasoner between several inconsistent but equally valid answers to a question. The concept of debt and related concepts, particularly the concept of a continuous self, readily give rise to logical paradoxes, which rhetorical paradoxes exploit in order to drive us towards counterintuitive conclusions.
Indent
发表于 2025-3-25 19:09:00
Book 2020plinary perspectives on problems of debt, credit, trust, interest, and investment in early modern societies. The collection includes essays by leading international scholars and early career researchers in the fields of economic and social history, legal history, literary criticism, and philosophy o
高调
发表于 2025-3-25 21:03:52
Book 2020city and credit; household economics; service; and the history of comedy. Across the collection, the book reveals debt’s ubiquity in life and literature. It considers debt’s function as a tie between the individual and the larger group and the ways in which debts structured the home, urban life, legal systems, and linguistic and literary forms. .
senile-dementia
发表于 2025-3-26 04:02:34
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3008/300765/300765_26.png
Omnipotent
发表于 2025-3-26 07:53:16
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3008/300765/300765_27.png
钻孔
发表于 2025-3-26 10:00:27
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3008/300765/300765_28.png
OUTRE
发表于 2025-3-26 15:01:41
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3008/300765/300765_29.png
Decibel
发表于 2025-3-26 20:47:03
Hypallactic Debt Management: The Rhetoric of Exchange in Wyatt and Shakespeares late plays, . (1609–10) and . (.. 1611). Hypallage emerges in this reading as a coordinating figure by means of which Shakespeare organises a complex of linguistic, ethical, legal and epistemic insights, and through which, ultimately, we are able not to resolve, but to repose in, the illegible and contradictory character of the debt relation.