coltish 发表于 2025-3-26 23:19:18
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3008/300762/300762_31.pngURN 发表于 2025-3-27 03:47:53
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3008/300762/300762_32.png扩大 发表于 2025-3-27 07:14:46
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3008/300762/300762_33.png萤火虫 发表于 2025-3-27 11:20:28
,Samuel Richardson vs. the ‘High Life Men’,to the .. Richardson had helped to print the 1725 edition of Sidney’s ., and its last eighteenth-century reissue was published in 1739, a year before Richardson’s novel. Gillian Beer even argues that the 1725 edition, which includes Richard Belling’s ., might ‘particularly have drawn Richardson’s atliaison 发表于 2025-3-27 15:51:48
Conclusion: The Fall of the Sequel,y’s text. By the Restoration, such an association no longer seems to have been possible, with the relationship between ‘original’ authors and continuators instead becoming one of commercial and moral competition. This more antagonistic dynamic comes to a head in the career of Samuel Richardson, whoAdj异类的 发表于 2025-3-27 19:53:15
9楼圆柱 发表于 2025-3-27 22:29:55
10楼孤僻 发表于 2025-3-28 04:46:09
10楼Intruder 发表于 2025-3-28 06:56:49
10楼合并 发表于 2025-3-28 11:34:40
10楼