后天习得 发表于 2025-3-23 11:22:07
nature of scientific inquiry. After illustrating this result with regard to the historical argument (a.k.a. the pessimistic induction) against realism, I suggest that such empirically attained meta-hypotheses can, in turn, be made methodologically prescriptive.Pageant 发表于 2025-3-23 17:44:55
Overview: Focuses on selected topics.Written by experts.Introduces new conceptsThis is a collection of high-quality research papers in the philosophy of science, deriving from papers presented at the second meeting of the European Philosophy of Science Association in Amsterdam, October 2009.978-94-007-3813-3978-94-007-2404-4rheumatism 发表于 2025-3-23 21:47:32
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3005/300473/300473_13.pngliaison 发表于 2025-3-24 02:15:20
Conference proceedings 2012This is a collection of high-quality research papers in the philosophy of science, deriving from papers presented at the second meeting of the European Philosophy of Science Association in Amsterdam, October 2009.粘连 发表于 2025-3-24 06:13:54
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3005/300473/300473_15.pngmotivate 发表于 2025-3-24 06:56:49
978-94-007-3813-3Springer Netherlands 2012Negotiate 发表于 2025-3-24 12:04:01
p the requirement that the model is a homomorphic mapping of the empirical relational structure. The model used for measurement will be a simulation, that is, the assumption of the appearance of something without having its structure. Or to put it briefly: It will be shown that outside the laboratorJOT 发表于 2025-3-24 15:37:58
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230244672ch serve as costly signals to the other sex about one’s fitness and readiness to take care for possible offspring. Starting from the standard prediction of evolutionary psychology that sexual selection produces psychological sex differences in human mating strategies, “mating intelligence” theory isAtaxia 发表于 2025-3-24 22:39:44
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3005/300473/300473_19.pngPOWER 发表于 2025-3-24 23:50:23
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-25312-0t not only our approach covers both aspects of scientific activity, but also because we assume a pragmatic perspective that tries to capture the intrinsic versatility that scientific models and explanations may adopt in the course of scientific discourse. Our view is essentially inspired by the work