CRATE 发表于 2025-3-28 18:15:01

http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2848/284773/284773_41.png

Nerve-Block 发表于 2025-3-28 21:20:27

http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2848/284773/284773_42.png

体贴 发表于 2025-3-29 01:54:19

Conclusion: Could We Reciprocate to the Wounded Little Bird?rom the beginning. Furthermore, it tries to reconstruct the value assumptions of liberalism, taking the concept of dignity as a clue. The disparity in status between the right to work and the right to well-being and the disregard of the utilization ability to use the rights to liberties are criticiz

谷物 发表于 2025-3-29 06:40:00

Reiko GotohThis book is open access, which means that you have free and unlimited access.Critiques how dignity is treated in the social sciences.Redefines dignity in social sciences.Examines dignity from the per

spondylosis 发表于 2025-3-29 08:21:42

http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2848/284773/284773_45.png

Senescent 发表于 2025-3-29 12:03:33

http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2848/284773/284773_46.png

intoxicate 发表于 2025-3-29 18:21:25

http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2848/284773/284773_47.png

多样 发表于 2025-3-29 21:33:18

http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2848/284773/284773_48.png

ferment 发表于 2025-3-30 03:25:51

Sonstige Bauflächen und Freiflächene the following three conceptual distinctions that have been controversial related to dignity (Sects. .–.). They are (1) “price” versus “dignity;” (2) “individual dignity” versus “human dignity;” and (3) “equality of human rights” versus “respect for dignity.” The second and more important purpose o

artless 发表于 2025-3-30 05:50:29

http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2848/284773/284773_50.png
页: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6
查看完整版本: Titlebook: Dignity, Freedom and Justice; Reiko Gotoh Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2024 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2024 Rawls.Eudaimonia.Politica