油膏
发表于 2025-3-26 23:26:49
,Dynamic Epistemic Logic for Budget-Constrained Agents,namic modality “.” which reads as “. holds after .’s question whether a propositional formula . is true”. In this paper we provide a sound and complete axiomatization for . and . and show that both logics are decidable.
foppish
发表于 2025-3-27 02:22:08
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2837/283631/283631_32.png
开始没有
发表于 2025-3-27 08:07:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2837/283631/283631_33.png
Medley
发表于 2025-3-27 10:18:21
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2837/283631/283631_34.png
Brocas-Area
发表于 2025-3-27 14:11:20
Li Rong Zhou,Jun Wu,Shenghua Wangal language extended only with cautious distributed belief is in fact strictly less expressive than the propositional language extended only with standard distributed belief. We, finally, identify a small extension of the language making the former as expressive as the latter.
STALE
发表于 2025-3-27 19:09:33
Cautious Distributed Belief,al language extended only with cautious distributed belief is in fact strictly less expressive than the propositional language extended only with standard distributed belief. We, finally, identify a small extension of the language making the former as expressive as the latter.
Lipoprotein
发表于 2025-3-28 00:16:58
0302-9743 eld in Haifa, Israel, in July/August 2022..The 8 full papers presented in this volume were carefully reviewed and selected from 22 submissions. They deal with new trends and applications in the area of Dynamic Logic. .978-3-031-26621-8978-3-031-26622-5Series ISSN 0302-9743 Series E-ISSN 1611-3349
euphoria
发表于 2025-3-28 02:46:26
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2837/283631/283631_38.png
venous-leak
发表于 2025-3-28 09:12:43
John A. Bryant,Stephen G. Hughesnamic modality “.” which reads as “. holds after .’s question whether a propositional formula . is true”. In this paper we provide a sound and complete axiomatization for . and . and show that both logics are decidable.
apropos
发表于 2025-3-28 12:57:01
Li Rong Zhou,Jun Wu,Shenghua Wangred by dynamic epistemic logic, and, in particular, by action models. We call the resulting logic coalition action model logic (CAML), which, compared to CL, includes additional modalities for coalitional action models. We investigate the expressivity of CAML, and provide a complexity characterisation of its model checking problem.