Abeyance
发表于 2025-3-21 20:07:00
书目名称Dynamic Image Analysis of Granular Materials影响因子(影响力)<br> http://impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0283609<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Dynamic Image Analysis of Granular Materials影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0283609<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Dynamic Image Analysis of Granular Materials网络公开度<br> http://impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0283609<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Dynamic Image Analysis of Granular Materials网络公开度学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0283609<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Dynamic Image Analysis of Granular Materials被引频次<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0283609<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Dynamic Image Analysis of Granular Materials被引频次学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0283609<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Dynamic Image Analysis of Granular Materials年度引用<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0283609<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Dynamic Image Analysis of Granular Materials年度引用学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0283609<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Dynamic Image Analysis of Granular Materials读者反馈<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0283609<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Dynamic Image Analysis of Granular Materials读者反馈学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0283609<br><br> <br><br>
脖子
发表于 2025-3-21 20:21:06
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-76448-9a particle. This chapter compared sand particle size and shape descriptors obtained using both DIA and µCT. The accuracy of particle volume assumptions employed for the 2D and 3D DIA methods was also evaluated. Finally, the correlation of shape descriptors obtained using 2D, 3D DIA and µCT were investigated.
entitle
发表于 2025-3-22 00:34:51
Book 2024 using DIA, including test parameters, specimen size, efficacy in gap-graded soils, and its limitations. DIA is a modern experimental technique used to analyze and classify particulate materials based on their size, shape, and other morphological properties. This method employs a high-frame-rate cam
Condense
发表于 2025-3-22 08:35:41
Zope and the Component Architecturetistics of large specimen sizes. This chapter summarizes the most commonly used methods for determining sand particle granulometry. The chapter presents advantages and disadvantages of sieve analysis, Micro-Computed tomography (.), Scanning Electron Microscopes (SEM), as well as 2D and 3D DIA.
Fibrinogen
发表于 2025-3-22 11:09:52
Zope and the Component Architecturemple weight, primary air pressure, and test duration were explored to determine the optimal specimen weight and equipment settings for DIA. Finally, the efficacy of DIA in resolving mixtures of fine and coarse sands was also established.
olfction
发表于 2025-3-22 16:50:08
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-76448-9eir different geologic and biologic origins. In addition, these two sands fall outside the range of common datasets used to correlate mechanical properties to particle shape parameters. Thus, morphologic analysis of these calcareous sediments can aid with understanding the engineering behavior of calcareous soils.
olfction
发表于 2025-3-22 20:03:47
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2837/283609/283609_7.png
NEG
发表于 2025-3-22 23:47:40
Best Practices for Conducting 2D DIA,mple weight, primary air pressure, and test duration were explored to determine the optimal specimen weight and equipment settings for DIA. Finally, the efficacy of DIA in resolving mixtures of fine and coarse sands was also established.
博爱家
发表于 2025-3-23 04:35:55
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2837/283609/283609_9.png
训诫
发表于 2025-3-23 05:52:19
Comparison of 2D/3D DIA and ,a particle. This chapter compared sand particle size and shape descriptors obtained using both DIA and µCT. The accuracy of particle volume assumptions employed for the 2D and 3D DIA methods was also evaluated. Finally, the correlation of shape descriptors obtained using 2D, 3D DIA and µCT were investigated.