琐碎 发表于 2025-3-25 04:21:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2834/283366/283366_21.pngBALK 发表于 2025-3-25 09:15:52
Judith Rifeser,Irina Herrschnerk on Frege: the dispute between realism and idealism, he says there, is the fundamental metaphysical issue, and it should be resolvable if we can determine the general form which a theory of meaning should take — that is to say, if we can determine what the central concept of the theory of meaning sBureaucracy 发表于 2025-3-25 14:21:34
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2834/283366/283366_23.png忍耐 发表于 2025-3-25 18:21:24
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2834/283366/283366_24.pngIntercept 发表于 2025-3-25 22:17:16
Philippa Holloway,Craig Jordan-Bakers to determine the semantic roles of various kinds of subordinate clauses. He devotes special attention to those clauses that occur in reports of speech acts and in reports of propositional mental acts-or-states (‘attitudes’). He calls them ‘abstract noun-clauses’ and contends that they designate pr同义联想法 发表于 2025-3-26 01:04:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2834/283366/283366_26.png小平面 发表于 2025-3-26 05:06:52
Philippa Holloway,Craig Jordan-Bakerr part of his .. None of the essays in the 2007 . volume. mentions them, which is fair enough, since the vast bulk of Dummett’s considerable achievements lie elsewhere. However they are notable for two reasons. Firstly, they illustrate Dummett’s interest in the roots of the movement of which he waslymphoma 发表于 2025-3-26 12:21:30
Naming Creatures: We Are all Ecopoets Nowht: the only route to a philosophical account of thought is through an analysis of its expression in words or symbols, that is, a theory of linguistic meaning’ (1991a, p. 17). In . (1991a) — and to a lesser extent in . (1993) — Dummett helps to build the case for this characterization of the analyti多节 发表于 2025-3-26 12:50:34
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2834/283366/283366_29.pngKeratectomy 发表于 2025-3-26 18:29:11
Dummett on the Logical Basis of Metaphysics,This essay is an abridged and slightly adapted version of chapter 14 of my book . (Moore, 2012).. The purpose of these opening remarks, which are not part of the original chapter, is to provide some necessary background from the rest of the book.